Monday, March 30, 2015

How corporations brought 'In God we trust' to public use

How 'One Nation' Didn't Become 'Under God' Until The '50s Religious Revival

The words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance and the phrase "In God we trust" on the back of a dollar bill haven't been there as long as most Americans might think. Those references were inserted in the 1950s during the Eisenhower administration, the same decade that the National Prayer Breakfast was launched, according to writer Kevin Kruse. His new book is One Nation Under God.
In the original Pledge of Allegiance, Francis Bellamy made no mention of God, Kruse says. Bellamy was Christian socialist, a Baptist who believed in the separation of church and state.
"As this new religious revival is sweeping the country and taking on new political tones, the phrase 'one nation under God' seizes the national imagination," Kruse tells Fresh Air's Terry Gross. "It starts with a proposal by the Knights of Columbus, the Catholic lay organization, to add the phrase 'under God' to the Pledge of Allegiance. Their initial campaign doesn't go anywhere but once Eisenhower's own pastor endorses it ... it catches fire."
Kruse's book investigates how the idea of America as a Christian nation was promoted in the 1930s and '40s when industrialists and business lobbies, chafing against the government regulations of the New Deal, recruited and funded conservative clergy to preach faith, freedom and free enterprise. He says this conflation of Christianity and capitalism moved to center stage in the '50s under Eisenhower's watch.
"According to the conventional narrative, the Soviet Union discovered the bomb and the United States rediscovered God," Kruse says. "In order to push back against the atheistic communism of the Soviet Union, Americans re-embraced a religious identity. That plays a small role here, but ... there's actually a longer arc. That Cold War consensus actually helps to paper over a couple decades of internal political struggles in the United States. If you look at the architects of this language ... the state power that they're worried most about is not the Soviet regime in Moscow, but rather the New Deal and Fair Deal administrations in Washington, D.C."

Kevin Kruse is a professor of history at Princeton University and is the author of a previous book called White Flight.i
Kevin Kruse is a professor of history at Princeton University and is the author of a previous book called White Flight.
Etta Recke/Courtesy of Basic Books

Interview Highlights

On how corporations hired ministers to spread "free enterprise"
The New Deal had passed a large number of measures that were regulating business in some ways for the first time, and it [had] empowered labor unions and given them a voice in the affairs of business. Corporate leaders resented both of these moves and so they launched a massive campaign of public relations designed to sell the values of free enterprise. The problem was that their naked appeals to the merits of capitalism were largely dismissed by the public.
The most famous of these organizations was called The American Liberty League and it was heavily financed by leaders at DuPont, General Motors and other corporations. The problem was that it seemed like very obvious corporate propaganda. As Jim Farley, the head of the Democratic Party at the time, said: "They ought to call it The American Cellophane League, because No. 1: It's a DuPont product, and No. 2: You can see right through it."
So when they realized that making this direct case for free enterprise was ineffective, they decided to find another way to do it. They decided to outsource the job. As they noted in their private correspondence, ministers were the most trusted men in America at the time, so who better to make the case to the American people than ministers?
On the message the ministers conveyed
They use these ministers to make the case that Christianity and capitalism were soul mates. This case had been made before, but in the context of the New Deal it takes on a sharp new political meaning. Essentially they argue that Christianity and capitalism are both systems in which individuals rise and fall according to their own merits. So in Christianity, if you're good you go to heaven, if you're bad you go to hell. In capitalism if you're good you make a profit and you succeed, if you're bad you fail.
The New Deal, they argue, violates this natural order. In fact, they argue that the New Deal and the regulatory state violate the Ten Commandments. It makes a false idol of the federal government and encourages Americans to worship it rather than the Almighty. It encourages Americans to covet what the wealthy have; it encourages them to steal from the wealthy in the forms of taxation; and, most importantly, it bears false witness against the wealthy by telling lies about them. So they argue that the New Deal is not a manifestation of God's will, but rather, a form of pagan stateism and is inherently sinful.
On the Rev. James Fifield
He takes over the pastorate at the First Congregational Church in Los Angeles, an elite church, literally ministering to millionaires in his pews. It's got some of the town's most wealthy citizens — the mayor attends service there, [Hollywood filmmaker] Cecil B. DeMille. He tells these millionaires what they want to hear, which is that their worldly success is a sign of heavenly blessing. He has a very loose approach to the Bible. He says that reading the Bible should be like eating fish: We take out the bones to enjoy the meat; all parts are not of equal value. Accordingly, he disregarded Christ's many injunctions about the dangers of wealth, and instead preached a philosophy that wedded capitalism to Christianity.
On Fifield's "spiritual mobilization"
"Spiritual mobilization" is his effort to recruit other ministers to the cause. So he is serving, in many ways, as a frontman for a number of corporate leaders. His main sponsors are Sun Oil President J. Howard Pew, Alfred Sloan of General Motors, the heads of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, they all heavily fund this organization. But what Fifield sets out to do is recruit other ministers to his cause. Within the span of just a decade's time, he has about 17,000 so-called minister representatives who belong to the organization who are literally preaching sermons on its Christian libertarian message to their congregations, who are competing in sermon contest[s] for cash prizes and they're doing all they can in their local communities to spread this message that the New Deal is essentially evil, it's a manifestation of creeping socialism that is rotting away the country from within. Instead they need to rally around business leaders and make common cause with them to defend what they call "the American way of life."
On Fifield's contribution to the alliance between business and Christian leaders
He helps refine the message considerably. He comes up with the phrase that reduces this Christian libertarian ideology down to a catchy slogan and that slogan is "Freedom Under God," as opposed to the slavery of the state. He popularizes this using the generous funding of his corporate backers ... through a weekly radio program that soon appears on over 800 stations nationwide, through monthly magazines that popularizes the writings of libertarian and conservative authors and most importantly, I think, through a massive Fourth of July ceremony in 1951, a ceremony organized by Cecil B. DeMille, featuring James Stewart as the master of ceremonies, and carried live coast-to-coast over national radio. In that ceremony, as in the magazine and the weekly radio show, he promotes this message that freedom under God is an essential value; that Americans need to cast off the slavery of the state and instead embrace a rugged individualism.
On "In God we trust" appearing on coins and stamps
So the phrase "In God we trust" comes from an often forgotten stanza of The Star-Spangled Banner. It goes: "Then conquer we must when our cause it is just, and this be our motto — 'In God is our trust.' " That stanza was largely forgotten until the Civil War when that phrase "In God we trust" is plucked out of that line and placed on coins. And it is done so at the urging of religious leaders who believe the Civil War has come as a result of America's original sin, of not officially being founded as a Christian nation. And they ask the secretary of Treasury to correct that and he does so by placing it on coins.
The phrase appears on coins intermittently over the next 50 or 60 years. Theodore Roosevelt tries to have it removed — he believes it's close to sacrilege — but the public outcry prevents him from doing so. During this moment of the Eisenhower years, the phrase flourishes and it does so first when it's placed on a stamp in 1954. Then [in] 1955, Congress decides to add it to not just coins but to paper money. And in 1956, they move to make it the country's first official national motto.
On the use of "God bless America" in presidential speeches
President Reagan is the innovator when it comes to the use of "God bless America." A study by communication scholars David Domke and Kevin Coe shows previously only one president had used that phrase to close a speech out and it's an inauspicious occasion — it's President Nixon in 1973 trying to talk his way out of the Watergate scandal. But Reagan quickly makes it a fixture of all of his speeches, so much so that we can't imagine a president ending a speech without some variation of "God bless America."

Sunday, January 18, 2015

Good reason to read the newspaper, at least online: FACTS difficult to find on the Internet without investigative reporters

State donor's cash in several war chests

Posted: January 18, 2015 at 3:10 a.m.
Updated: January 18, 2015 at 3:11 a.m.
In the past 15 years, more than $1.2 million in campaign gifts to candidates for Arkansas' most powerful political offices have originated with one man: Fort Smith nursing home owner Michael Morton.
photo
A listing of nursing home owner Michael Morton's largest contributions. (Credit: Arkansas Democrat-Gazette)
In a state where fundraisers consider $1,000 a decent-size campaign donation, Morton and his businesses gave $88,000 to newly elected Attorney General Leslie Rutledge's campaign last year, according to an Arkansas Democrat-Gazette review of campaign finance disclosure records.
How we did it
The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reviewed a computer database of contributions from nursing home owner Michael Morton of Fort Smith and companies he owns or operates, as listed in the Arkansas secretary of state’s office.
The gifts were dated from October 1999 through October 2014.
The contributions were compiled by the National Institute on Money in State Politics, a Helena, Mont., nonprofit. The nonpartisan group tracks virtually all campaign contributions of statewide, legislative, judicial and other candidates in major races in all 50 states.
Arkansas is among a handful of states that still do not require candidates — at least those for statewide and legislative offices — to file campaign finance reports into electronic databases. The state requires only paper filings. The Montana nonprofit hires workers to transcribe the paper reports into electronic formats available to the public.
Morton directed $30,000 to new Gov. Asa Hutchinson's 2014 race and $36,000 to Hutchinson's Democratic opponent, Mike Ross.
And Morton generated more than $100,000 in campaign contributions for five successful Arkansas Supreme Court candidates over the past five years: Justices Rhonda Wood ($40,000), Courtney Goodson ($25,000), Karen Baker ($24,000), Josephine Linker Hart ($10,000) and Robin Wynne ($5,000).
Political fundraisers have long known Morton as one of the state's most generous campaign contributors. Now the nursing home owner's donations are drawing scrutiny for another reason.
In a Jan. 9 guilty plea to a federal bribery charge, former Faulkner County Circuit Judge Michael Maggio admitted reducing a jury's award in a negligence lawsuit against a Faulkner County nursing home from $5.2 million to $1 million.
In exchange for the ruling, Maggio's plea said, the judge was to receive campaign contributions from the nursing facility's owner, identified as "Individual A." News accounts and separate court records, however, have named the nursing home -- Greenbrier Nursing and Rehabilitation Center -- and its owner as Morton.
The plea also mentioned an "Individual B" who served as a go-between for the donations. Former state Sen. Gilbert Baker has acknowledged helping raise money for Maggio's campaign.
Neither Morton nor Baker have been charged with any crimes.
Baker could not be reached for comment last week. Morton declined to talk about the Maggio case or other campaign contributions.
In earlier interviews, Morton has said he expects nothing more from judges than for them to "follow the laws of Arkansas."
Maggio, 53, could face a maximum sentence of up to 10 years in prison, up to three years of supervised release and a fine of up to $250,000.
The newspaper's review of Morton's campaign gifts since late 1999 found donations to more than 170 candidates for office, ranging from the U.S. Congress to the Arkansas Legislature.
The newspaper studied only campaign finance records filed with Secretary of State Mark Martin's office, which include statewide and legislative races. The review did not look at reports filed by candidates seeking county or city offices.
Morton and more than 40 of his businesses provided almost $1,245,000 to statewide and legislative candidates in the past 15 years, the newspaper found.
The Democrat-Gazette reviewed more than 750 campaign donation records listing gifts from Morton or his nursing homes to candidates and political parties.
At least 12 candidates accepted $20,000 or more from the nursing home operator, records show. In addition to Rutledge, Hutchinson, Ross and the three Supreme Court justices, Wood, Goodson and Karen Baker, the candidates include: Tim Cullen, a Little Rock lawyer who ran unsuccessfully for a seat on the Supreme Court in 2014; former state Sen. Bruce Holland, R-Greenwood; former state Rep. John Burris, R-Harrison; former Republican Gov. Mike Huckabee; state Sen. Missy Thomas Irvin, R-Mountain View; and former state Rep. Denny Altes, R-Fort Smith.
The largest gifts stretch back to 2000. Huckabee's gubernatorial campaigns received $25,500 from Morton from 2000 to 2002, campaign finance records show.
Contributions to Rutledge, Cullen, Holland and Burris carried only 2014 dates.
Donations legal
Arkansas law sets the maximum campaign contribution from one individual at $2,000 per candidate per election. Experts say such limits exist to keep wealthy donors from having too much financial influence over public officials.
Until Arkansas voters banned corporate donations in the Nov. 4 general election, Morton and other business operators could legally skirt the gift-limit rule by donating to a candidate through each of several companies they controlled.
Channeling $88,000 in campaign gifts to Rutledge, for example, required checks from 24 Morton companies and Morton himself.
Because Rutledge faced three elections last year -- the Republican Party primary, a runoff and the general election -- her limit from a single contributor was $6,000.
Morton and at least seven of his businesses each donated the $6,000 maximum in the Rutledge races, campaign finance disclosure records show. Other Morton properties sent in $4,000 or less.
The Democrat-Gazette asked a Rutledge spokesman if she knew she had accepted $88,000 from Morton and his companies last year and if she felt any pressure for favors in return.
Rutledge "has not, nor has she ever been asked to, and will never, provide services in response to a campaign contribution," spokesman Judd Deere wrote in an emailed response.
The newspaper asked how the donations might appear to affect the attorney general's role in investigating nursing homes accused of patient abuse and other wrongdoing.
"Attorney General Rutledge ... will work to investigate and prosecute anyone who abuses or neglects those in nursing home facilities," the spokesman wrote.
Fundamental right
The Democrat-Gazette attempted last week to contact all 12 candidates for statewide, legislative and judicial offices who have accepted at least $20,000 in campaign gifts from Morton and his businesses, as found in campaign finance records.
Most did not immediately respond.
One who did was Little Rock attorney Cullen, who lost his race last year for the Arkansas Supreme Court to then-Court of Appeals Judge Robin Wynne. Morton and his nursing homes contributed $38,000 toward Cullen's campaign, records show.
"Michael Morton, like every citizen, has a fundamental right to participate in elections by making publicly disclosed campaign contributions within the legal limits," Cullen wrote in an email. "Maggio's guilty plea is a stain on the independence, impartiality, and integrity of the judiciary; however, I do trust that the members of the Arkansas Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and trial judges all over the state have the courage and character to rule on cases based on the law and the facts, and are not unduly influenced by campaign contributions from any source."
Cullen went on to say that Morton's campaign contributions are disclosed in public records, unlike so-called dark money spent by nonprofit groups in his campaign and others that are not required to reveal financial backers' names.
"By publicly disclosing campaign contributions, anyone appearing before a judge can assess the potential for bias, and ask the judge to recuse," or remove himself, from a case, Cullen wrote.
Burris, the former legislator, said in an emailed interview that he didn't feel pressure to perform political favors in return for $28,000 that Morton and his companies contributed to his 2014 campaign.
"If Mr. Maggio allowed a campaign contribution to affect a decision he made as a public official, he should be held accountable," Burris wrote. "I have accepted contributions from Mr. Morton. He was one of the least aggressive persons with whom I worked. We interacted less than a handful of times. I was under no pressure from him or any of his associates."
Mark Henry, campaign manager for Justice Baker, said his candidate followed judicial ethics rules that require those candidates to distance themselves from donors and fundraising to help avoid conflicts of interest and apparent conflicts of interest.
"She never once indicated she was aware of the source of her funding," Henry said. "She had no interest or direct involvement."
After Maggio's guilty plea to the federal charge of bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds, a lawyer working for the family of patient Martha Bull, who died in Morton's Greenbrier nursing home, talked to the newspaper.
Thomas Buchanan urged lawmakers and other elected officials to stop accepting campaign donations from Morton.
"They need to return what they have [already received] because if you think that there's not something expected in return, think again," he said.
None of the public officials and former candidates interviewed by the newspaper said they planned to return Morton contributions.
A spokesman for Justice Wood said she already had refunded a portion of Morton's donations.
Records show she returned $23,000, in addition to the $40,000 she accepted.
The spokesman said Wood had no further comment.
Rutledge's spokesman said Rutledge "has not returned any of the contributions."
SundayMonday on 01/18/2015

Saturday, March 1, 2014

Mark Swaney likely to run for U.S. Senate as Green Party Candidate from Arkansas

Video with several photos of Mark Swaney and another set of photos of a proposed development site in  south Fayetteville. At this link: Aubrey James Shepherd slideshows on public-access television.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Brief respite for Burns Park geese: Get out and suggest some alternative solutions: I can't drive to NLR to speak but, if I did, I would probably tell those who want to destroy the geese to 'make peace with nature' and get a real life.

Share
Sort
Comments (5) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

People had planned on that for Christmas dinner. And, the bounty would have been shared with the hungry among us. Not everyone can go to a hunting club, money is kind of tight these days...
report 0 of 11 people like this. like dislike
Posted by Jill Watson Cox on December 12, 2011 at 7:48 PM

Congratulations to the Mayor for his willingness to explore other options.
report 9 of 9 people like this. like dislike
Posted by mountaingirl on December 12, 2011 at 7:57 PM

Hays, you wimp!
report 1 of 7 people like this. like dislike
Posted by Doc on December 12, 2011 at 8:00 PM

Once again, in the holiday tradition, "Honk if You Love Geeses."
report 2 of 3 people like this. like dislike
Posted by Doc on December 12, 2011 at 8:01 PM

I'm not a fan of Commodore Hays, but I give him credit on this issue for having an open mind, listening to numerous constituents and others who opposed the so called "hunt", and having the guts to change his mind and acknowledge that there may be a better solution than the planned slaughter- oh, sorry "hunt", I keep forgetting. It would have been nothing of the sort.

Okay folks, now is your chance to tender suggestions by Thursday to fix the problem of soccer moms stepping in deep doo-doo.

Gotta wonder if Hays grandkids asked him: "Grandpa, why are you going to kill 150 geese?" Geez, that's like shooting Santa when he comes down the chimney!
report 6 of 8 people like this. like dislike
Posted by Sound Policy on December 12, 2011 at 8:27 PM
Showing 1-5 of 5
Comment
Add a comment

Author Archives

*
Hackers tap Jonesboro Library bank account
The Jonesboro Sun reports today that the Jonesboro Library bank account was hacked and $37,000 stolen.
o by Max Brantley
o Sep 21, 2011
*
Parallel drawn on Penn State-church scandals UPDATE
The New York Times continues to report confidently, though without named sources, that Joe Paterno's days as Penn State football coach are soon to be over.
o by Max Brantley
o Nov 9, 2011
* More »

Event Calendar

« »

December
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Events Movies Music Art Theater
most recent comments
top viewed stories
most emailed stories

*
Re: Occupy Wall Street is making a difference
o

Lighten up. Francis
o Posted by MarcKyle64
o on December 12, 2011
*
Re: GOP field: 'Liars, demagogues, ignoramuses'
o

Paul Krugman summed it up beautifully a week or so ago in the NYTs. To…
o Posted by rawebb
o on December 12, 2011
*
Re: Monday, Monday
o

Why okay to do it to children, then?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-16153…

o Posted by Norma Bates
o on December 12, 2011

*
BREAKING: A reprieve issued for Burns Park geese
I didn't see the full discussion, but I caught the tail end of the North Little Rock City Council meeting tonight at which the Council agreed with Mayor Pat Hays to postpone next week's planned controlled goose hunt in Burns Park to reduce the flock of near-domesticated waterfowl.
*
Paragould teacher, warned before, reluctantly takes down Nativity Scene UPDATE
And a Merry Xmas to you, too, from the pages of the Paragould Daily Press.
*
North Little Rock lists its goose hunters
Looking for some wild goose meat for Christmas dinner? Having eaten some, I can't recommend it over the domestic variety, particularly with the soupcon of golf course seasoning.
*
Potential sites for research park revealed
The Little Rock Research and Technology Park Authority will hold a community briefing at 4 p.m.
*
Monday, Monday
The line is open. Parting words: * TOP THIS LEDE PARAGRAPH: Suffocation of prostitute fiancee; meth and bondage sex party; incinerated corpse.

*
Lee County justice: the mistrial of Curtis Vance
Even with DNA evidence that would have been ironclad in most courtrooms, the blacks on a Marianna jury refused to convict Curtis Vance of Rape. The question is: why?
*
A few bits of Arkiana
A few bits of Arkiana, definitions and elaborations, alphabetically arranged for your convenience, to pass a few minutes of a slow week.
*
Crafting Suds
Diamond Bear grows along with tastes for real beer.
*
Rethink higher education
The new University of Arkansas System president's vision for online education.
*
It's not child's play
Big money, religion, presidential politics, high-dollar lawyers. They’re all part of the ongoing and expensive story of mental health care for kids in Arkansas.

Top Commenters

* eLwood
eLwood
* the outlier
the outlier
* Norma Bates
Norma Bates
* plainjim
plainjim
* couldn't be better
couldn't be better

Blogroll

* Street Jazz

Slideshows

*
Occupy Little Rock marches in downtown Little Rock on Oct. 15.
Occupy Little Rock marches
Occupy Little Rock marches in downtown Little Rock on Oct. 15.

Site Index
News

Cover Story / Arkansas Reporter / The Week That Was / Smart Talk / The Insider / The Observer / Editorial / Max Brantley / Ernest Dumas / Gene Lyons / Bob Lancaster / Words / Guest Writer / Letters
Entertainment

A&E Feature / To-Do List / In Brief / Movie Reviews / Music Reviews / Theater Reviews / A&E News / Art Notes / Graham Gordy / Books / Media / Dining Reviews / Dining Guide / What's Cookin' / Calendar / The Televisionist / Movie Listings / Gallery Listings

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Homeless people to be offered 'tent cities' in Seattle, Washington, if churches take advantage of new decision by city government

 Originally published Monday, October 3, 2011 at 9:08 PM

City eases tent-city rules for churches

Advocates for the homeless say they don't expect a proliferation of tent encampments now that the Seattle City Council has voted to allow religious organizations to host tent cities without a permit and without a limit on the number citywide.
Seattle Times staff reporter
quotes I live in a tent city. It is a real blessing. We are, for the most part, hard working... Read more
quotes Let's call them HopeNChange Villes. Read more
quotes How lovely. Read more
advertising
Click here
Advocates for the homeless say they don't expect a proliferation of tent encampments now that the Seattle City Council has voted to allow religious organizations to host tent cities without a permit and without a limit on the number citywide.
"There's still not a bunch of congregations rushing to do this, but it does expand the ways the unsheltered in the city are cared for," said the Rev. Bill Kirlin-Hackett, director of the Interfaith Task Force on Homelessness.
The City Council unanimously approved an ordinance Monday that makes encampments a legal accessory use to a religious facility. That means churches, mosques, temples and other faith-based organizations can provide temporary shelter on their property, subject to basic health and safety rules and a limit of 100 people per encampment.
Currently there are two tent encampments in Seattle, Tent City 3 and Nickelsville.
Under the new ordinance, religious organizations don't have to notify neighbors and there is no limit on how long an encampment may stay in one place.
Councilmember Nick Licata, who sponsored the legislation, said that with the city's homeless shelters filled to capacity, tent encampments represent "one solution."
The new law also responds to court rulings and a 2010 state law that says cities can't impose undue burdens on religious organizations that want to serve homeless people as part of their mission.
But some homeless advocates and residents of Tent City 3 opposed the legislation because the easier rules apply only to churches, not secular groups and private landowners, which have to apply for a temporary-use permit to host an encampment.
"Don't go out of your way to limit secular landowners who want to help us," Paul Marshall, a Tent City 3 resident, told the City Council before Monday's vote.
Under a 2002 court-ordered agreement between the city and Share/Wheel, a nonprofit that organizes Tent City 3, nonprofits and private landowners that host Tent City 3 currently do not have to obtain a permit but must notify the city, said Bob Scales, government-affairs section director for the Seattle city attorney. That agreement expires in March.
Lynn Thompson: 206-464-8305 or lthompson@seattletimes.com

More from our network

You might be interested in

More from the Web


Selected for you by a Sponsor
Selected for you by a sponsor:

Originally published September 28, 2011 at 8:52 PM | Page modified September 29, 2011 at 9:08 PM
Corrected version

Seattle may ease tent-city rules for churches

The City Council on Monday will vote on an ordinance to allow churches — but not secular groups — to host temporary tent encampments for the homeless without a permit and without setting limits on the length of stay or the number of encampments in the city.
Seattle Times staff reporter
quotes Does anyone recall The CIVIL CONSERVATION CORPS? I was a senior double trade and... Read more
quotes Hawkeye, I will agree that the church based tent cities are more organized and better... Read more
quotes The neighborhoods where these encampments are situated should be very afraid. When tent... Read more
advertising
At Mary's Place, a Seattle day center for homeless women and children, a new family arrived every day in August, the biggest influx in the center's 11 years of operation.
The women at the South Lake Union center make up to 50 calls in a day trying to find temporary housing for their families anywhere within a six-county area, said Mary Hartman, the executive director.
"There's nowhere to send anybody. There's not even an emergency bed, let alone a transitional bed," Hartman said.
With existing city shelters all operating at capacity, officials have been searching for ways to meet the emergency survival needs of the homeless. The City Council on Monday will vote on an ordinance to allow churches to host temporary tent encampments without a permit and without setting limits on the length of stay or the number of encampments in the city.
It would give churches more freedom to host homeless encampments. But private landowners and nonprofits wanting to host encampments would still have to obtain a temporary-use permit, which can cost up to $2,000 and take several months to approve.
That's leading homeless advocates to say the proposed legislation doesn't go far enough.
"There may be other entities willing to host these encampments besides churches. Why step backward when there's no reason to?" asked Estela Ortega, executive director of El Centro de la Raza, a nonprofit civil-rights organization on Beacon Hill.
The group was fined $17,000 by the city for hosting Tent City 3 before a consent decree was adopted in 2002 that allows not only churches, but also private landowners and nonprofits, to host encampments. That 10-year agreement expires in March.
City Councilmember Nick Licata says the proposed legislation is a "middle-of-the-road" approach that recognizes churches' constitutional rights to establish homeless encampments on their property as part of their religious mission, while asking other organizations to get permission before setting up an encampment. He said the council during upcoming budget negotiations will explore waiving the permit fees for secular organizations that want to host encampments.
Since the inception of the 10-year Plan to End Homelessness in 2005, the city has provided funding to build or remodel 1,818 units of housing for formerly homeless adults, families and youth, according to the city Housing Office. But the one-night count of the homeless last winter found nearly that many people living on the streets.
Mayor Mike McGinn and the City Council have been locked in a standoff over where to site a long-term encampment that could meet some of the emergency-shelter needs.
The council in March rejected McGinn's proposal to locate an encampment at the city-owned Sunny Jim site in Sodo, saying the former industrial property wasn't suitable for habitation and wasn't close to stores or public transit. Instead, the council said it would review other proposals, including possibly buying a building and converting it to dormitory housing.
An alternative plan advanced by the mayor in May, to locate a shelter at the former Lake City Fire Station 39, has run into similar opposition as the Sunny Jim site: Neighbors object to an influx of homeless people, and council members question the wisdom of spending almost $1 million to improve a facility that is slated to be sold in three years.
A frustrated McGinn last week said he would spend the $1.8 million earmarked for a homeless encampment on leaky city roofs instead.
The Seattle Union Gospel Mission has proposed operating the shelter at Fire Station 39 at no cost to the city. But residents say they already have several low-income housing facilities in the neighborhood, including McDermott Place, a 75-unit apartment building for low-income people and veterans that opened in 2009.
"We're not against helping people, but Lake City is doing more than its share. The neighborhood is at a tipping point," said Jim Hicks, a Lake City activist who lives near the fire station.
Officials at the Union Gospel Mission say they hope at least to operate an emergency shelter at the fire station for four months this winter.
"This is a way to meet the most immediate need while we figure out a long-term solution," said Mike Johnson, the mission's special-projects director.
Meanwhile, a second tent encampment, Nickelsville, moved in May from Fire Station 39 to city-owned land on West Marginal Way South. The camp already has stayed beyond the 90 days typically allowed for homeless encampments, and a spokesman for McGinn told the West Seattle Blog that the city would not seek to evict residents.
Asked this week if the site could become the elusive long-term encampment the mayor has sought, McGinn spokesman Aaron Pickus said the mayor's office was still hoping the City Council would propose a plan.
At the homeless women's day center, Mary's Place, Director Marty Hartman isn't waiting for city action. She's enlisted local churches to each provide up to 14 homeless women and children with shelter for as long as they need. She said 10 churches have committed to help, but estimates she needs four more.
Lynn Thompson: 206-464-8305 or lthompson@seattletimes.com
Information in this article, originally published Sept. 28, 2011, was corrected Sept. 29, 2011. A previous version of this story incorrectly said that organizations other than churches would be subject to a new permitting process under the proposed legislation. The legislation would remove the current permit requirement for churches, but not other organizations.